Saturday, November 28, 2009

Fear

Fear. It's one of our basic instincts. An emotional reaction to the threat of violence. It is catagorized as a survival mechanism.

We've all experienced it; in comes in various forms: a deep penetrating and sinking feeling, to complete and total physical constraint.

It is just as present in our lives as joy, happiness, sadness, and despair. How have we manifested this emotion in creative arts today? Movies and paintings that resurface nightmares or past events.

What about in music? It creeps into the esoteric developments of new grundge and heavy metal bands. ICP (Insane Clown Posse) was a band I remember, not so fondly, inculcating those ideals. Fear. But more of a fear related to the detriment of morality, ethics, and pride. The down grade of society to lesser human traits of rape, pillage, murder, and the degredation of the human soul.

Where is the fear in instrumental music? Has it inculcated in the works of Futurism? A past movement of machinist and industrial development? But, even with such works, it still manages to purge the humanistic ideals of fear.

Not that I want to go to a concert of a famous pianist and be in a constant state of fear the entire time. I just find it fascinating that it's an emotion that we as musicians have more difficulty portraying.

The things one thinks of while showering...

Monday, November 23, 2009

Noise as Art; Art as Noise.

This was a slap-dash article I wrote for History Class. I wish I had more time to write something more substantial, but one must do all they can with only a few hours. I should learn to stop procrastinating so much…

A discussion of a few basic differences between Futurism and Traditional art/music:

Futurism differs from Traditional music and art in many ways. A few worth discussing, which set these genres apart, are its musical intent, inspiration, and compositional techniques.

The intent of Futurist music can be readily identified through many "manifestos" and "artist books" written by the Italian and Russian artists who championed the movement. One such manifesto, The Art of Noise (Futurist Manifesto, 1913), by Luigi Russolo aptly discusses the underlying intent of the Futurist movement. Russolo states that:

Noise…comes to us confused and irregular as life itself, never reveals itself wholly but reserves for us [innumerable] surprises. We are convinced, therefore, that by selecting, [coordinating], and controlling noises we shall enrich mankind with a new and unsuspected source of pleasure.

We see the intent of the Futurist movement, through Russolo's manifesto, as creating a bridge between what society conceives as noise an effectively juxtaposing it with music to create a new and homogenous sound.

These Futurist concepts and ideas are also very evident in visual art. In Umberto Boccioni's Technical Manifesto of Futurist Sculpture, the idea of incorporating life into ones work is an essential part of its revitalization. This is much the same idea discussed by Russolo regarding music. Boccioni makes a clear point about the incorporation of ones physical environment with art, he says:

[Artist must render] their extension into space palpable, systematic, and plastic, because no one can deny any longer that one object continues at the point another begins, and that everything surrounding our body (bottle, automobile, house, tree, street) intersects it and divides it into sections by forming an arabesque of curves and straight lines.

The Futurist movement's intent is very different from that of Traditional art, as we can see from these two manifestos. Traditional art was intended to invoke and inculcate certain emotions and humanistic pathos. On the transverse, the Futurist intent seemed more to homogenize the industrialized surroundings of ones life (speed, violence, machinery, etc.) with art, regardless of whether or not it created a pleasing aural and visual experience.

The inspiration of Futurist and Traditional artist also differ in a variety of ways. Futurist artists are "sated" with the works of Beethoven and Wagner and gain a "much greater pleasure from ideally combining the noises of streetcars, internal-combustion engines, automobiles, and busy crowds than from re-hearing, for example, the 'Eroica' or the 'Pastorale'." We see that Traditional artist were inspired more by lyrical and melodic concepts, where as Futurists were more so influenced by the sounds of man-made machines. Many of Beethoven's works (a composer inevitably pinned as a Traditionalist by Futurists) were inspired by more humanistic ideas. For example, Beethoven was inspired by heroism in composing his "Eroica" Symphony.

Traditional art and music are created by "traditional instruments," were as Futurist relied more on the employment of new instruments. These new "noise instruments" or intonarumori were lead and designed by Russolo himself. They were intended to reproduce timbres of machinery, howling, automobiles, etc. The timbral effects of these instruments is, in itself, counteractive to the ideals of traditional music, where traditional instruments were created and designed to emulate the human voice, allowing each instrument to bring to fruition the meldoci and lyrical lines motives of composers.

We see the development of new concert guidelines and more extensive performance notes emerge with the advent of the Futurist movement. Most notable is Karlhienz Stockhausen's "Helicopter String Quartet," were he has written very detailed performance notes on how the work is performed, ensuring a smooth coordination between musicians, audio engineers, and helicopter pilots. Traditional music still upholds, as we see in today's concert halls, same performance practice principles established many centuries ago.

Discussion of compositional elements of the "descendents of Futurism":

In Zierolf's article, he regards many works as descendents of the original musical Futurism. Two works mentioned in his article, Ruth Crawford's "Piano Study in Mixed Accent" and Karlheinz Stockhausen's "Helicpoter Quarter," will be analyzed and discussed for their distinct characteristics that exemplify traits of Futurism.

Ruth Crawford's "Piano Study in Mixed Accent," composed in 1930 for piano, exemplifies the mechanistic aspects of Futurism. Imitating machinery was an essential aspect of Futurist music. Groves notes Futurists adherent "obsession with speed, machines and industry" in their compositions. Crawford's work is
exemplary in manifesting and mimicking these practices, particularly the mechanistic sounds. In a review by Graham Simpson, he compares Crawford's work to that of an Einstein equation, showing the work's less than humanistic
qualities. Simpson writes that the work is "…a steely line of articulation across the keyboard which has the poise and self-sufficiency of an Einstein equation."

    "Helicopter String Quarter," by Karlheinz Stockhausen, is a magnificent representation of the Futurist ideals. It incorporates both traditional musical instruments with the industrial sounds of a helicopter. Stockhausen can be seen as the predecessor to early Italian and Russian Futurist, using the technology and devices which were "unavailable to the earlier Futurists, [where] their "music of noises" remained an imaginative fantasy." An imaginative fantasy, that Stockhausen made real.

The work, as noted in Zierolf's article,
"requires four helicopters, each containing a member of a string quartet. Sounds made by the string instruments mix with the rotor sounds, all sent to the controller on the ground via radio then mixed in real time to produce the composition. The sound of the rotors spooling up is identical to the way an airplane propeller begins from stasis to ultimate RPM and pitch". All elements defined by Futurism.

On Stockhausen's website, he goes into detail about how the strings predominantly play tremolo to match the rhythmic undulations of the helicopter propeller. He writes, "Most of the time, the string players played tremoli which blended so well with the timbres and the rhythms of the rotor blades that the helicopters sounded like musical instruments." The melding of these two sounds, both traditional and mechanical, or natural and un-natural, is one of the prominent characteristics of Futurism. Furthermore, Stockhausen goes into great detail about how the work should be performed, notating how the audio speakers are to be arranged in the concert hall to the responsibilities of each audio engineers on the helicopters and in the concert hall.

Merits and Shortcoming of Futurism:

No doubt Futurism has its merits: how it has influenced composers, how we as musicians perceive and listen to the world around us, to how it has propagated the development and experimentations of new timbral sounds. But all good things have their shortcomings as well; Futurism is no exception to this. Notably, its extreme performance demands to its lack of any real melodic or lyrical development.

Zierlof's discusses, to a small extant, the lack of influence generated by Futurism, but on the contrary many composers have indeed been inspired by the movement's limitless compositional possibilities. One such composer that was influenced by these Futurist concepts was Kristofori Pendercki, were feeds off of the machinistic aspects of violence and speed. Particularly Pendercki's String Quartet No. 2 and his "Threnody for the Victims of Hiroshima" which adequately portray Futurist ideals. Ligeti's "Poeme Symphonique" for 100 metronomes, though labeled as chance music, is another work which upholds the concepts of Futurism. These being only a small hand full of works which had a direct influence from Futurists.

Futurism has its shortcomings as well. Conceptually, music has been a means of expressing human emotion for thousands of years. Earliest concepts of this can be seen in the Doctrine of Ethos by the Ancient Greeks, a doctrine that goes into great detail about the effects of musical sound on the human pathos and spirit. "Even Aristotle, in his Politics, explains how the different kinds of music, imitating specific feelings (anger, kindness, love), can affect a human behavior." Futurist music lacks, in many forms, the capacity to inculcate basic human emotions, less that emotion be of confusion.

Aside from the lack of any melodic or lyrical material, the performance requirements for Futurist music can put a catastrophic halt on any concert. If we take not to the requirements for Stockhausen's "Helicopter String Quarter," one can see that such a production would be extremely difficult, costly, and dangerous.

Saturday, November 7, 2009

That's Nice - Now, Play it Again.

We're always searching for that definitive - we'll, everything - recordings, phrasing, musical genus, technique - I find that sometimes on this quest, we verge off that path a bit (OR A LOT) and end up in the briar bushes, picking thorns out of every which body part.


My current playlist for the Mozart Concerto is Jon Manasse, Sabine Meyer, Reginald Kell, and Marcellus.

I like this concept of hearing something new and fresh when it comes to the Mozart. The Mozart can be like playing scales, we tend to just DO IT, and not think about the musical value of, yes I'm going to say it, scales. The Mozart, I think, perpetuates that stagnant playing especially if we're not careful about getting out of the notes and playing the music.

Lets liven it up a bit!!! Recordings are my best source for a fresh, new, and sometimes crazy look on works. And even better, if I just sit down in complete silence and study/sing all the parts of the score and solo to really development my own voice - it's a miraculous breakthrough! It's meticulous and I need to approach my studies like this more.

No doubt some teachers would disagree with my methods - but, then again, there are some really awfully teachers teaching people how to play the clarinet (this frightens me, by the way). That's beside the point, however, I'm old enough to know concepts of tone - I know the sound I want - not Reginald Kell's.

See, I'm removing thorns again - stupid ADD.

The impetus for writing this blog is that, on my shuffle playlist of Mozart recordings, Reginald Kell popped on. I smiled, actually, I think I giggled. At first listen, I couldn't help but notice his inconsistent vibrato.

I kept imagining someone grabbing his shoulders, while he's playing, and shaking him violently to make the vibrato. Wouldn't that be a spectacle at the Kennedy or Lincoln Center!
Something sparked my interest and I went back and listened again - stripping the "nuances" he is so fond of and simply listened to the music. Listening for his melodic development, treatment of the line - I wanted to hear how he sings. And though his tone can be compared to that of a clarinet made of Campbell's Soup Cans - his concept of phrase is really quite spectacular. I really am just sort of giddy over his eloquent sensitivty to the ebbs and flows, dissonances and consonances of the music. His music making is just something else. But - conceptually his tone - is different.

You have to get passed that fluff and allow the bias, that we as
clarinetists today harbor, to disappear. Just because it's different, just because it's not what you'd do - doesn't always mean that they're a bad musician, or stupid, or awful, or gay, or what-have-you.

There are other criteria which makes one a bad musician - like CLOSE MINDEDNESS.

I just got so excited about listening to this recording, weird, I KNOW! But I just saw it in a completely different light. Many years, I've sort of scorned such playing - but, it's something very new to me now.


I mean - I'm not going to go off and play with vibrato or switch to strength two reeds on a plastic see-through mouthpiece with a tin foil ligature (all though, that would be funny!) It's the music man! It's beautiful how we can create all these different and exciting stylistic ideas and concepts!!!

It's just hard to get passed Kell's vibrato and bright tone....

I can't WAIT to practice today!!!

Wednesday, November 4, 2009

Tune for Intonation

My "ode" to Josh Oxford.

I can't say that I'm a pitch nazi - but - I do like playing in tune. I wonder sometimes, and really wonder, if others pay as much attention to their own pitch. I can't count the number of times Josh and I have argued over the pedagogical study and development of intonation - how one should approach it, when it should be introduced into ones lesson, etc. etc. Or, even on a much deeper level, how intonation can shape a phrase - like, playing something slightly under the pitch. And by that, I mean outside of conventional harmonic treatment i.e. playing the third "xyz" flat so it coincides with the major chord...blah blah blah.

You get the idea.

We're talking about playing entire phrases slightly flat or sharp to change the timbre, mood, and indication of a phrase. It's a fascinating concept, and one I wish I had more time to study and research.

One day...when I'm done with "conventional" schooling. BUT...

Ones idea and concept of pitch is, I believe, contingent upon ones ability as a musician. Developing your ear is just as essential and important as developing your technique or legato or...anything. I find that the older I get, and the more aware of the pitch tendencies of my instrument, the more horrendously annoyed I become when others take such a reckless approach to their intonation.

How important is it to know the tendencies of your instrument? UHM...REAL IMPORTANT. How will my horn play when it's completely cold or after I've been playing for an hour...two hours. These are important things to know, especially as a performer and even more so as an orchestral player.

And please don't think that, while I'm on my soap box, I play perfectly in tune 'cause that's false. I struggle with it just as much as others, I worry about it, and many times stress about it - because I know for me it's what makes or breaks a performance. It's really hard to get passed bad intonation - especially when it's egregious.

A lot of this is boiling to the top because of my ensemble playing lately. We walk into rehearsal, tune at A-440, half way through rehearsal we're at A-442 and sometimes, I swear I'm playing at A-444 when I leave. I CAN BITE BUT SO MUCH!!!!

I accept this, I understand this, and have learned to adjust to the tendencies of the said ensemble.

Sometimes I really do wonder what teachers teach their students about intonation. How do they approach it? I don't think a majority of a students lesson should be focused on intonation, but I do think that students should be taught how to identify when and how they're out of tune. A tuner is just as important as a metronome. On the flip side of that, a student has to use the tuner as a guide - not a know all, be all.

Nothing really sparked this annoyance. Well, that's a lie, I'm just choosing to be judicious about what my impetuous was for this blog.

My tangent has gone on long enough - I need my energy to scream at the medical staff at the student health in the morning...a blog...for another day.

Happy PITCH MATCHING and music making!

Monday, November 2, 2009

Musicians are K-RAZY.

You know that adage, "Work hard, play harder." Man...is that not the truth or what? I can't imagine a group of individuals that work as hard as musicians. We are constantly being scrutinized, judged, forced to work in EXTREMELY stressful situations - and many of us do it with a smile!

Conservatory life is no different. Let me tell you. Particularly when you start seeing a trend within the practice rooms - the same people from 8am-12, and from 4-1
am - you learn what rooms to avoid because you know that annoying trumpet player loves these XYZ rooms which are closely connected. Or, when that good looking such-and-such player is practicing in their usual room.

A tangent. Sorry.

We're CRAZY.

Well, we really do play hard. Sometimes, I think we forget ourselves and when we let loose - we forget that others are around. Thankfully, we have each other, and we can always trust our fellow musicians in knowing that, If I get crazy...it's more than likely, you're tailing my tracks and following suit.

What a weekend!

I'm working on a Nielsen Clarinet Concerto Post - with some interesting analysis that I've done and a few article clippings and research I've found here and there.

Cheers and happy music making!!!